DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BIG ;
Docket No: 6032-13
4 June 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and entered a period of active
duty on 5 May 1987. You received nonjudicial punishment on two
-occasions for uttering checks with insufficient funds (three
occasions), unauthorized absence, and dereliction of duty. You
were then notified that your commanding officer was recommending
you for administrative separation due to misconduct. You
exercised your procedural right to have your case heard by an
administrative discharge board (ADB). The ADB found that you
had committed misconduct, and recommended that you be discharged
with a general characterization of service. On 26 October 1990,
you were discharged with a general characterization of service
due to misconduct, and Were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended
for retention) reentry code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth service,
and current desire to upgrade your discharge. However, the
Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due
to your acts of misconduct. You are advised that no discharge
is upgraded due merely to the passage of time or post service
good conduct. In view of the above, your application has been
‘denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
‘furnished. upgn,. request .
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
‘the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Te D_ Lo
ROBERT D. ASALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6018 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5133 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your numerous acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5818 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4182-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7715 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6354 13
On 6 May 1986, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4B (in-service drug use) reenlistment code. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official .NMhaval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4698 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2014. However, the Board ‘concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your numerous acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4737 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 8 April 2014. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4165-13
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 25 March 2014. the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, , _ regulations and policies. Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6314 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...